This is a continuation to a previous post.
Dr Michel Pasquier, the AI lecturer seems to have finished marking that paper. It has been almost 2 weeks and I must say that he IS very efficient.
| ?Good News Bad News
This
document provides detailed feedback about the AI examination paper set
in 2005-2006 S1. As was the case last year, it starts with some general
comments and statistics and continues with a rather comprehensive list of the errors observed in answers to the 4 questions (Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4)” />.
The overall outcome of the paper was a pleasant surprise.
The paper was neither harder nor easier than previous ones though,
hence the improvement originates elsewhere. For one thing, I observed
far fewer “silly mistakes” than before, and also it would seem most
have done their homework this time, as basic AI concepts have been
understood well enough. Hopefully all the efforts put into all these
exam paper notes is starting to pay off… Not much to comment or
complain about then – especially since I have now created a separate
document elaborating on the
|
